We must not label everyone under 18 as “children”, nor assume that sex for someone under 16 or 18 (take your pick) is invariably “abuse”, nor treat images of fictitious children as real “abuse”.
Free software zealot, eccentric habits
Discussion on child sexual abuse images
Undated, but related to earlier comments on the topic
Found in 1 providers: gemini
Cross Reference
1 source
"The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing."
Controversial"I don't use any software that requires me to agree to a restrictive license."
Strange & Unusual"I put the term in quotes because US law dishonestly defines images of young adults even of age 17 as 'child pornography', despite the fact that most Americans of age 17 have had sex."
Controversial"The article refers to the sex worker as a 'child', but that is not so. Elsewhere it has been published that she is 16 years old. That is late adolescence, not childhood."
Controversial"I exercise my authority over glibc very rarely – and when I have done so, I have talked with the official maintainers. So rarely that some of you thought that you are entirely autonomous. But that is …"
Humorous