Linus Pauling — "I was able to solve this problem because I don't have a computer. I know what I …"
I was able to solve this problem because I don't have a computer. I know what I am doing every step, and the steps go slowly enough that I can think.
Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
Kitchen
Apparel
Other
More from Linus Pauling
"I am not, however, militant in my atheism. The great English theoretical physicist Paul Dirac is a militant atheist. I suppose he is interested in arguing about the existence of God. I am not. It was …"
"Orthomolecular medicine is the preservation of good health and the treatment of disease by varying the concentrations of substances normally present in the body."
"Anybody could see that quantum mechanics must lead to the tetrahedral carbon atom, because we have it. But the equations were so complicated that I never could be sure that I could present the argumen…"
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible."
"I believe that the world is full of wonderful things, and that we should all strive to appreciate them."
Details
Commenting on problem-solving methods
Date: 1991 (The San Francisco Chronicle)
Self-DeprecatingVerification
Unverifiable
Found in 1 providers: gemini
1 source checked
Understanding this quote
What it means
Working without automation forces deliberate, methodical engagement with every step of a problem. When no tool accelerates the process, the thinker must understand each move rather than delegating cognition. Slowing down becomes an advantage — you catch errors, build intuition, and generate insights that speed and abstraction obscure. The quote argues that the constraint of doing it yourself is precisely what produces genuine understanding rather than just an answer.
Relevance to Linus Pauling
Pauling won two Nobel Prizes — Chemistry (1954) for his chemical bond theory, Peace (1962) for anti-nuclear activism. His landmark work on molecular structure, electronegativity, and protein alpha-helices relied on physical model-building and hand calculations. He trusted his own step-by-step reasoning deeply — notably when his flawed triple-helix DNA model showed even great minds can err. His science was inseparably personal, rooted in direct mechanical intuition rather than delegated computation.
The era
By the mid-20th century, mainframe computers were transforming scientific research — IBM machines solved equations that previously took months by hand. In the 1950s–70s, computational chemistry emerged as a distinct field. Scientists increasingly delegated calculation to machines, accelerating research but distancing themselves from the mechanics. Pauling's comment cuts against that trend, asserting genuine scientific insight requires the friction of manual understanding — a pointed stance as automation reshaped how knowledge was produced.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].