Linus Pauling — "Science is the search for truth, and engineering is the search for ways to make …"
Science is the search for truth, and engineering is the search for ways to make things work.
Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
Kitchen
Apparel
Other
More from Linus Pauling
"The greatest discoveries of science have always been made by those who were not afraid to challenge the existing paradigms."
"I am not, however, militant in my atheism. The great English theoretical physicist Paul Dirac is a militant atheist. I suppose he is interested in arguing about the existence of God. I am not. It was …"
"I have always been a curious individual, and I believe that curiosity is the engine of progress."
"I believe that science and ethics are inextricably linked, and that we have a responsibility to use our knowledge wisely."
"If there were nobody in the world but politicians, I would feel that there was no hope for mankind, no hope for civilization, no hope for the world."
Verification
Unverifiable
Found in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
Understanding this quote
What it means
Science and engineering serve different masters: science pursues understanding — asking what is true and why — while engineering focuses on what works. Neither is superior; they're complementary. A scientist asks why the sky is blue; an engineer designs a lens that captures it. One builds knowledge, the other builds solutions. Both require rigor and creativity, but they measure success differently — truth versus function.
Relevance to Linus Pauling
Pauling embodied both sides of this divide. His 1954 Nobel Prize in Chemistry came from pure truth-seeking — his quantum model of the chemical bond transformed how scientists understand molecular structure. Yet he also acted as an engineer of peace, applying scientific reasoning to argue against nuclear weapons testing, earning a second Nobel Prize in 1962. He believed science's moral obligation was to make truth serve humanity.
The era
Pauling worked through much of the 20th century, when the Cold War made the science-engineering divide consequential in an entirely new way — pure nuclear physics became atomic weapons within years of discovery. Post-WWII government and industry poured funding into research, forcing debates about whether science should chase truth or deliver strategic advantage. His framing offered clarity at a moment when the boundary between discovery and destruction felt dangerously blurred.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].