Niels Bohr — "It is not enough to be wrong, one must also be polite."
It is not enough to be wrong, one must also be polite.
Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
Kitchen
Apparel
Other
More from Niels Bohr
"The ultimate goal of science is to understand the universe and our place in it."
"Physics is an attempt to describe the world, and it is impossible to describe the world without describing ourselves."
"The universe is a symphony of interconnectedness."
"We are all in the same boat, in a stormy sea, and we owe each other a terrible loyalty."
"The word 'reality' is also a word, a word which we must learn to use correctly."
Verification
Confirmed
Found in 2 providers: gemini,grok
2 sources checked
Understanding this quote
What it means
Being incorrect is forgivable, but how you deliver a wrong idea matters just as much as the idea itself. Intellectual discourse requires civility alongside honesty. You can challenge, question, and even be mistaken, but maintaining respectful exchange is the foundation that keeps dialogue productive and relationships intact. Rudeness poisons the well of collaboration even when you happen to be right.
Relevance to Niels Bohr
Bohr built the Copenhagen school of quantum mechanics through relentless collaborative debate with Einstein, Heisenberg, and Pauli. His famous debates with Einstein over quantum indeterminacy stretched decades and were famously courteous despite deep disagreement. Bohr believed physics advanced through cooperative argument, not combat, and his institute in Copenhagen became legendary precisely because he cultivated an atmosphere where being wrong was safe.
The era
Early 20th-century physics was violently revolutionary, with relativity and quantum theory overturning centuries of Newtonian certainty. Scientists were forced to publicly abandon positions they had defended for careers. Bohr operated through two world wars, witnessing how ideological rigidity and contempt destroyed both science and civilization. Civility in disagreement was not just etiquette but a precondition for the collaborative science that era demanded.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].