John von Neumann — "When we look at the results of computation, we don't always know what they mean."
When we look at the results of computation, we don't always know what they mean.
When we look at the results of computation, we don't always know what they mean.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"The problems of today cannot be solved by the methods of yesterday."
"The sciences do not try to explain, they hardly even try to interpret, they mainly make models. By a model is meant a mathematical construct which, with the addition of some verbal interpretations, de…"
"The world is not logical, it is psychological."
"The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa."
"Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them."
Reflecting on the challenges of interpreting complex computational outputs.
Date: 1950s
GeneralFound in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
Computation can produce outputs that are technically correct yet remain opaque or difficult to interpret. Running a calculation or simulation yields numbers or patterns, but understanding what those results actually signify—what they tell us about reality, about the problem, about truth—requires human judgment, intuition, and further analysis that the machine itself cannot provide.
Von Neumann designed the foundational architecture of modern computers and pioneered numerical methods for weapons simulations and fluid dynamics. He regularly confronted results from early computers like ENIAC and IAS that required deep physical intuition to interpret. His game theory work similarly produced mathematical equilibria whose real-world meaning demanded careful translation beyond the raw mathematics.
The 1940s-50s saw the first electronic computers tackling hydrogen bomb calculations, weather prediction, and economic modeling—problems whose outputs were genuinely novel and uncharted. Scientists had no interpretive tradition for machine-generated results. This tension between computational power and human understanding defined early computing culture and foreshadowed modern debates about algorithmic opacity and AI interpretability.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty