Neil deGrasse Tyson — "I'm often asked whether I believe in God. I'm an agnostic."

I'm often asked whether I believe in God. I'm an agnostic.
Neil deGrasse Tyson — Neil deGrasse Tyson Contemporary · Astrophysicist, science communicator

Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:

Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.

Kitchen

Apparel

Other

About Neil deGrasse Tyson (born 1958)

American astrophysicist, Hayden Planetarium director, and Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey host who carries the Carl Sagan public-science mantle. Closely associated with Bill Nye (fellow science communicator) and Brian Greene (theoretical physicist and string-theory popularizer). For an intellectual contrast, see Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum — Ham's career has been organized around defending biblical 6-day creationism — exactly the science-education position Tyson's mainstream-science communication is structured to refute.

Details

Interview with Big Think

Date: 2012

General

Verification

Unverifiable

Found in 1 providers: grok

1 source checked

Understanding this quote

What it means

The speaker refuses certainty about God's existence in either direction. Agnosticism holds the question is unanswerable with current knowledge—neither provable nor disprovable. Rather than defaulting to a socially comfortable answer, this is intellectual honesty: the rigorous position is withholding judgment where evidence is insufficient. It distinguishes the speaker from both believers claiming certainty and atheists who deny God's existence with equal confidence neither position can scientifically justify.

Relevance to Neil deGrasse Tyson

Tyson has explicitly resisted the 'atheist' label, calling it epistemically dishonest given absent definitive evidence. As director of the Hayden Planetarium and host of Cosmos, he operates within empirical science where claims require evidence. His agnosticism mirrors his scientific method: suspend judgment where data is absent. He has noted publicly that the atheist label carries cultural baggage that would distort his science communication and misrepresent how scientists actually think about unfalsifiable questions.

The era

Tyson rose to prominence during the New Atheism movement of the 2000s, when Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris made aggressive atheism culturally visible. Simultaneously, intelligent design battles in US courts—notably Kitzmiller v. Dover in 2005—sharpened perceived conflict between science and religion. High-profile scientists were routinely pressed for religious positions in politically charged contexts. Tyson's agnostic stance carved a deliberate middle path during an era demanding binary allegiance from public intellectuals.

AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].

Your Cart

Your cart is empty