Erwin Schrodinger — "The problem of the 'thing in itself' is not a problem that can be solved by scie…"
The problem of the 'thing in itself' is not a problem that can be solved by science. It is a philosophical problem.
The problem of the 'thing in itself' is not a problem that can be solved by science. It is a philosophical problem.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"There is no quantum jump. There is no such thing as a quantum jump. It is all balderdash."
"The quantum mechanical description of reality is certainly incomplete."
"The world is not a collection of independent objects, but a single, indivisible whole."
"The great task of science is to unify all knowledge."
"This life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of this entire existence, but in a certain sense the whole."
Austrian physicist who shared the 1933 Nobel for the wave equation that bears his name and the famous cat thought-experiment. Closely associated with Werner Heisenberg (matrix-mechanics rival who reached the same physics by different math) and Albert Einstein (his pen-pal on quantum interpretation). For an intellectual contrast, see Niels Bohr, Danish physicist and architect of the Copenhagen interpretation — Schrödinger's cat thought-experiment was specifically designed to ridicule Bohr's 'observer-dependent reality' reading of quantum mechanics — Schrödinger thought the Copenhagen interpretation was absurd; the cat was meant as reductio ad absurdum.
Found in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
Science can describe how things behave and interact, but it cannot reach beyond appearances to explain what things fundamentally are at their deepest level. That deeper question — what reality actually is, not just how it operates — belongs to philosophy, not to equations or experiments. Science maps the surface; the underlying nature of existence remains outside its jurisdiction.
Schrödinger, who founded wave mechanics and grappled with quantum measurement, knew firsthand that physics produces mathematical formalisms, not ontological certainty. His wave function describes probabilities, not definite realities — a gap that haunted him. He engaged seriously with Vedantic philosophy and Kant's noumenal/phenomenal distinction, believing physics alone could never answer what consciousness or matter truly are.
In early-to-mid 20th century physics, quantum mechanics had shattered classical certainty. The Copenhagen interpretation sidestepped ontology entirely, declaring physics should predict measurements, not describe reality. This philosophical agnosticism troubled many physicists, sparking fierce debate about what the theory actually meant. Schrödinger's remark reflects that tension — a generation forced to confront science's limits precisely when it seemed most powerful.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty