Michael Faraday — "The philosopher should be a man willing to listen to every suggestion, but deter…"
The philosopher should be a man willing to listen to every suggestion, but determined to judge for himself.
The philosopher should be a man willing to listen to every suggestion, but determined to judge for himself.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"I am busy just now again on the old subject of light and experiment, and hope to have some new views to bring out."
"I have lived to see the day when electricity is no longer a toy, but a powerful agent in the service of mankind."
"The greatest pleasure in life is to discover something new."
"The history of science is his library."
"A man who is certain he is right is almost sure to be wrong."
Attributed, emphasizing independent thought in scientific inquiry.
Date: Mid 19th Century (approx.)
Justice & RightsFound in 2 providers: grok,deepseek
2 sources checked
A true thinker stays open to any idea someone offers, no matter how unusual or who says it. But hearing ideas isn't the same as accepting them. You weigh the evidence yourself, test claims against reason and experience, and reach your own conclusion. Openness without judgment is gullibility; judgment without openness is dogma. The goal is balancing curiosity with rigorous, independent evaluation rather than deferring to authority or dismissing outsiders.
Faraday embodied this stance. Born poor, self-taught from bookbinding apprentice scraps, he entered science without formal credentials and faced dismissal from elite theorists. Yet he listened to every experimental hint, followed unfashionable leads on magnetism and electricity, and trusted his own bench results over prevailing mathematical orthodoxy. His discovery of electromagnetic induction came from patient, independent judgment, refusing both blind deference to Davy and reflexive rejection of new ideas.
Faraday worked during the early-to-mid 1800s, when science was professionalizing and aristocratic Royal Society figures often gatekept ideas. Romanticism encouraged intuition while Enlightenment rationalism demanded proof. Industrial Revolution discoveries arrived faster than theory could explain them, so practicing scientists had to sift countless speculative claims from tinkerers, natural philosophers, and engineers. Judging evidence independently, rather than deferring to credentialed authorities, was becoming the defining habit of modern empirical science.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty