Niels Bohr — "The fundamental problem of all science is the description of the world."
The fundamental problem of all science is the description of the world.
Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
Kitchen
Apparel
Other
More from Niels Bohr
"Light and justice are not goods, but they are the condition of goods."
"The great challenge of quantum theory is not to understand how it works, but to accept that it works."
"The electron is not a thing but an abstraction."
"The task is not so much to see what no one has yet seen, but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees."
"The future of humanity depends on our ability to understand and harness the power of science."
Details
This also seems to contradict his more famous quotes, similar to the above.
Date: Unknown
EducationalVerification
Unverifiable
Found in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
Understanding this quote
What it means
Science's core challenge isn't just building technology or curing disease—it's finding the right language and framework to accurately represent how the world actually works. Before you can explain or predict anything, you must first decide what a valid description even looks like. The hardest part of science isn't calculation; it's determining what counts as a true account of reality, which requires constant rethinking of the tools we use to describe it.
Relevance to Niels Bohr
Bohr spent his career confronting the limits of description directly. His Copenhagen interpretation held that particles lack definite properties until measured, meaning classical language fundamentally breaks down at subatomic scales. He debated Einstein repeatedly over whether quantum mechanics offered a complete description of reality. His complementarity principle argued that wave and particle descriptions are both valid yet mutually exclusive—two irreconcilable pictures of the same phenomenon, exposing language itself as a scientific problem.
The era
Bohr worked during quantum mechanics' revolutionary birth in the 1920s and 1930s. Physics had just shattered Newtonian certainty: electrons behaved as waves and particles simultaneously, causality appeared probabilistic, and observation seemed to alter outcomes. Scientists weren't merely discovering new facts—they found their entire descriptive vocabulary inadequate. This crisis of representation, how to describe phenomena that defy classical intuition, became the defining intellectual struggle of early twentieth-century physics.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].