If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"The very motion of our life is towards happiness."
"I am a simple Buddhist monk, nothing more. But I try my best to serve humanity."
"I am a monk, but I am also a scientist. I believe that science and spirituality can go hand in hand."
"Sometimes I feel very sad when I see so much suffering in the world. But then I remember that I have a responsibility to help."
"We need to learn to live together in peace and harmony, and not just tolerate each other."
Found in 1 providers: deepseek
1 source checked
Truth-seeking must take priority over preserving inherited doctrine. When verifiable evidence conclusively contradicts a belief, intellectual honesty requires updating or abandoning that belief rather than defending it out of tradition or loyalty. No system of ideas — however ancient or revered — is exempt from correction by evidence. Genuine understanding matters more than institutional consistency. This is a statement of radical epistemic humility rare among leaders of major world religions.
Tenzin Gyatso has spent decades in structured dialogue with scientists through the Mind & Life Institute, which he helped establish in 1987. His Buddhist training itself emphasizes rigorous investigation of the mind over blind faith. He has engaged neuroscientists studying meditation, physicists, and cognitive researchers, treating empirical findings as complementary to contemplative practice. This quote reflects his consistent position: Buddhism is a path of inquiry, and honest investigation — not institutional defensiveness — defines genuine wisdom.
The Dalai Lama articulated this during a period of sharp global tension between science and religion — creationism battles, New Atheist critiques from Dawkins and Hitchens, and post-9/11 scrutiny of religious rigidity. Simultaneously, neuroscientists were measuring meditation's effects on the brain for the first time, validating contemplative practices empirically. His statement directly countered the defensive posture many religious institutions adopted, positioning Buddhism as uniquely willing to evolve under scientific pressure.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty
