Charles Darwin — "The greatest error of all is to stop at the first result."
The greatest error of all is to stop at the first result.
The greatest error of all is to stop at the first result.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants."
"I have been much struck by the fact that the more I have read about the subject, the less I have understood it."
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."
"I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit."
"I feel most deeply that the whole subject is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton."
British naturalist whose On the Origin of Species (1859) established evolution by natural selection — the unifying theory of modern biology. Closely associated with Thomas Henry Huxley (his 'bulldog' public defender) and Alfred Russel Wallace (independent co-discoverer of natural selection). For an intellectual contrast, see William Paley, Anglican theologian and Natural Theology author (1743-1805) — Origin of Species is structurally a 400-page reply to Paley — Darwin admired Paley's watchmaker-argument as an undergraduate at Cambridge and then spent 20 years building the empirical machinery to displace him. The cleanest 'design argument vs natural selection' founding rebuttal in science.
The standard scholarly entry points to Charles Darwin's work: Janet Browne (Harvard, history of science) — Charles Darwin: Voyaging (1995) and The Power of Place (2002); Adrian Desmond (UCL, biographer) — Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist (1991, with James Moore). These are the works graduate seminars cite when teaching Charles Darwin.
Found in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
This quote warns against accepting preliminary findings as final. The first result in any inquiry—scientific, professional, or personal—is a starting point, not an endpoint. Deeper investigation almost always reveals nuance, contradiction, or better explanations. True progress requires questioning initial conclusions, running more tests, and resisting the temptation to call something finished before it is fully understood. Premature closure is intellectual laziness disguised as efficiency.
Darwin spent over 20 years refining his theory of natural selection before publishing On the Origin of Species in 1859. His Galápagos observations were just the beginning—he subsequently studied barnacles for eight years, conducted breeding experiments, and gathered global evidence. This relentless iterative method, rather than rushing to publish initial findings, defined his career and gave evolutionary theory the evidential weight it needed to withstand fierce scientific and religious opposition.
Darwin's Victorian era was a period of rapid scientific expansion but also one where initial theories quickly hardened into dogma. Natural theology dominated—early naturalists argued creation's design was self-evident at first observation. Geology was simultaneously overturning biblical chronology, proving Earth's history demanded rethinking beyond surface readings. Darwin's era required scientists to push past first impressions; the entire shift from creationism to evolution was a civilization-scale refusal to stop at the first available explanation.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty