Erwin Schrodinger — "The scientific picture of the world is very successful, but it is incomplete. It…"

The scientific picture of the world is very successful, but it is incomplete. It leaves out something essential, something that is very close to us, namely, our own consciousness.
Erwin Schrodinger — Erwin Schrodinger Modern · Wave mechanics

Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:

Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.

Kitchen

Apparel

Other

About Erwin Schrodinger (1887-1961)

Austrian physicist who shared the 1933 Nobel for the wave equation that bears his name and the famous cat thought-experiment. Closely associated with Werner Heisenberg (matrix-mechanics rival who reached the same physics by different math) and Albert Einstein (his pen-pal on quantum interpretation). For an intellectual contrast, see Niels Bohr, Danish physicist and architect of the Copenhagen interpretation — Schrödinger's cat thought-experiment was specifically designed to ridicule Bohr's 'observer-dependent reality' reading of quantum mechanics — Schrödinger thought the Copenhagen interpretation was absurd; the cat was meant as reductio ad absurdum.

Details

Attributed, general philosophical stance.

Date: Approx. 1950s

Shocking

Verification

Unverifiable

Found in 1 providers: grok

1 source checked

Understanding this quote

What it means

Science excels at measuring, predicting, and describing the external world—from quantum particles to galaxies. But all those equations and observations exist only because someone is aware of them. Consciousness—the felt, first-person experience of being alive—is absent from every scientific model. Schrödinger argues this isn't a minor oversight; it's a fundamental incompleteness, since the very instrument doing the science is the mind science cannot fully account for.

Relevance to Erwin Schrodinger

Schrödinger formulated the wave equation governing quantum systems, yet spent decades troubled by what quantum mechanics implies about the observer. His books "What Is Life?" and "Mind and Matter" show a physicist genuinely wrestling with consciousness. He studied Vedanta philosophy and believed the multiplicity of minds might be an illusion of one universal consciousness. For him, omitting awareness from physics wasn't academic—it was the central unresolved problem of his intellectual life.

The era

In the 1940s–1950s, quantum mechanics had just dismantled classical determinism, leaving physicists arguing about what observation and measurement actually mean. Logical positivism dominated philosophy, insisting only empirically verifiable statements mattered—threatening to make consciousness philosophically unspeakable. Meanwhile, Turing was asking whether machines could think. The tension between physics' extraordinary success and its complete silence on inner experience was becoming impossible for reflective scientists like Schrödinger to ignore.

AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].

Your Cart

Your cart is empty