Isaac Newton — "The frame of nature, and the system of the world, we are to observe by the pheno…"
The frame of nature, and the system of the world, we are to observe by the phenomena, and not to frame by imagination.
Get This Quote & Author's Image Illustrated On:
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
Kitchen
Apparel
Other
More from Isaac Newton
"I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people."
"Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in the multiplicity and confusion of things."
"The power of gravity is of such a nature as to penetrate to the very centres of the sun and planets, without suffering the least diminution of its force."
"In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God's existence."
"For the best and safest way of philosophizing seems to be, first to inquire diligently into the properties of things, and of establishing them by experiment, and then to proceed more slowly to hypothe…"
Verification
Unverifiable
Found in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
Understanding this quote
What it means
Understanding nature and the cosmos demands direct observation of what actually happens—phenomena—not imagined explanations invented to seem logical. Science must start with evidence, not clever theories built from assumptions. We observe the world as it is, gather data, and let reality tell us its rules. Any system we build to describe nature must answer to what we actually see, not to what we find intellectually satisfying or intuitively pleasing.
Relevance to Isaac Newton
Newton's entire career embodied this principle. His Principia Mathematica drew on observed planetary data from Kepler and Galileo, not philosophical assertions. He famously declared 'hypotheses non fingo'—I frame no hypotheses—refusing to speculate on gravity's cause beyond describing its mathematics. His optics work relied on prisms and real light. He rejected Descartes' vortex theory of planetary motion precisely because it was imagination dressed as explanation, unsupported by observation.
The era
In Newton's 17th-century Europe, natural philosophy was split between Aristotelian scholasticism taught in universities and Cartesian rationalism, which built elaborate mechanical systems through pure reasoning. Descartes explained planetary orbits using imaginary vortices of invisible matter—no experiment required. The Royal Society, founded 1660, championed 'nullius in verba'—take nobody's word for it. Newton's empirical insistence was a decisive break from century-old habits of reasoning from first principles rather than from observed data.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].