The positivists have a simple solution: the world must be divided into that which we can say clearly and the rest, which we had better pass over in silence. But can anyone conceive of a more pointless philosophy, seeing that what we can say clearly amounts to next to nothing? If we omitted all that is unclear, we would probably be left completely uninteresting and trivial tautologies.
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first."
"I would say that I was absolutely convinced of the possibility of our making a uranium engine. but I never thought that we would make a bomb. and at the bottom of my heart. I was really glad that it w…"
"The uncertainty principle refers to the degree of indeterminateness in the possible present knowledge of the simultaneous values of various quantities with which the quantum theory deals."
"If a man is to be a good physicist, he must have an intuitive grasp of the physical reality, which can be acquired only by much experience."
"There is a fundamental error in separating the parts from the whole, the mistake of atomizing what should not be atomized. Unity and complementarity constitute reality."
Found in 1 providers: gemini
1 source checked
Heisenberg pushes back against the idea that we should only discuss topics we can describe with perfect precision and stay silent about everything else. He argues this approach is useless because the things we can state with total clarity are usually obvious, empty statements. The most meaningful questions about reality, meaning, and existence are inherently fuzzy, and refusing to engage with them leaves us with nothing worth saying.
Heisenberg built his career on embracing uncertainty as fundamental, not as a flaw to eliminate. His uncertainty principle proved that position and momentum cannot both be known precisely, forcing physics to abandon classical clarity. He frequently debated philosophy with Bohr and Einstein, and wrote extensively on the limits of language in describing quantum reality. This quote directly challenges the Vienna Circle positivists who tried to restrict science to verifiable statements.
Heisenberg worked during the rise of logical positivism, when thinkers like Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle argued philosophy should abandon metaphysics and stick to empirically verifiable claims. Simultaneously, quantum mechanics was shattering classical certainty, revealing that subatomic reality defied clean description. Post-WWII Europe was also grappling with moral and existential questions that pure logic could not answer, making the positivist stance feel increasingly inadequate to lived human experience.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty
