Alan Turing — "The question is not 'Can machines think?' but 'Can machines do what we (as think…"
The question is not 'Can machines think?' but 'Can machines do what we (as thinking entities) can do?'
The question is not 'Can machines think?' but 'Can machines do what we (as thinking entities) can do?'
Click any product to generate a realistic preview. Up to 3 at a time.
* Initial load can take up to 90 seconds — revising the preview in another color is nearly instant.
"We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done."
"We are trying to create a machine that can solve problems."
"The problems of biology can be reduced to physics and chemistry."
"In the time of Galileo it was argued that the texts, 'And the sun stood still ... and hasted not to go down about a whole day' (Joshua x. 13) and 'He laid the foundations of the earth, that it should …"
"The human brain has a finite number of states, and so it can be simulated by a finite state machine."
Interpretation of his work, not a direct quote but often attributed as his underlying sentiment.
Date: N/A
GeneralFound in 1 providers: grok
1 source checked
The quote shifts debate from abstract philosophy to practical behavior. Instead of wrestling with whether machines possess genuine thought — a question tangled in consciousness and semantics — Turing argues we should ask whether machines can perform every task a thinking human can. If behavior is indistinguishable, the internal mechanism becomes irrelevant. It's a pragmatist's redirection: define intelligence by outputs and capabilities, not by unknowable internal experience.
Turing published this idea in his landmark 1950 paper 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence,' proposing the Imitation Game — now called the Turing Test. Having cracked Nazi Enigma ciphers at Bletchley Park using mechanical reasoning, he knew machines could execute complex logical tasks. As a gay man prosecuted by his own government for who he was internally, he understood firsthand how unjust it is to judge inner life from the outside. Functional equivalence was personal conviction.
In 1950, the first electronic computers were barely five years old. World War II had demonstrated machines could perform feats of computation humans couldn't — breaking codes at superhuman speed. The Cold War was accelerating investment in computing. Yet philosophers and theologians fiercely resisted the idea that machines could rival human minds. Turing's reframing arrived precisely when society needed it: a clear, testable standard replacing an unanswerable metaphysical argument about consciousness.
AI-generated insights based on extensive research and information for context. Factual errors? Email [email protected].
Your cart is empty